Skip to main content

Looper: A review


SPOILERS

SO I saw the new movie Looper recently. It was a time-travel-crime-drama that I have to say was one of the better movies I have seen in a while.


Looper is defiantly one of those movies you have to see more than once to catch everything it has to offer. Kind of like another of JGL's movies...


Basically, Joseph Gordon-Levitt plays a “looper” named Joe in the year 2044. A looper is an agent hired by a crime syndicate (that exists 30 years in the future) to kill people sent back to the year 2044. Keeping up so far?

JGL gets a pay day to kill each of the people sent back to him. He does this loyally to the leader of the 2044 syndicate, Al (Jeff Daniels), until it comes time for JGL to “close his loop.” Closing a loop means killing ones future self. This proves difficult for him as his future self turns out to be Bruce Willis.

Still a BAMF minus the hair.

I loved the concept of this movie. The writers were able to keep the time line clean enough so that there was not too much confusion when it came to people and events.  That is never easy to do when it comes to anything time travel.

MORE SPOILERS

My only major gripe with the movie was that it was JGL’s first lead role but his character was a reflection of Bruce Willis. All of his acting potential and all of his abilities went in to mimicking an actor who already had a set acting style. I’m not saying JGL was terrible at it quite the contrary actually. He was able to perfectly reflect Bruce’s facial expressions, mannerisms, and even his voice. Add on the CG effects and he looked and acted EXACTLY like Bruce Willis. This is a great reflection on an actor when they are so easily able to play a role like that. I guess I was just disappointed that he did not have the opportunity to showcase more of his talents as an actor. He did not have the opportunity to make his first lead role “his own” since it was just a reflection of a preexisting actor with an already established acting style.  



When it comes to time travel movies, even when the time line is kept nice and clean questions start to arise. I was left wondering why the crime syndicate of the future didn’t just kill people in the future and send their corpses to the past to be disposed. After all the main reason they were being sent back to the past was because, “It’s near impossible to hide a body in the future.” That way they could be sure the person was dead and they would not have to worry about a “loop running.”

1.21 GIGAWATTS!!!
 
I also wished there had been a little more development with the character referred to as “Kid.” He worked for Al and had a knack for doing stupid sh*t.  He was really cocky but only ever managed to f*ck up and make the situation worse than it already was. I had no idea (until a friend pointed it out) that Kid was the 2044 version of Jeff Daniel’s character, Al. Looking back I can see the subtle hints in the movie. Both characters walked with a limp, both had a southern drawl, and no matter how bad Kid managed to f*ck up, Al never seemed to do more than break a few bones. I didn’t realize he was preserving the character as not to harm his future self. The hints were super subtle and I feel like that would have been an opportunity for a “big reveal” at the end of the movie. 

"I'm going to need you to explain that one more time."

Maybe I’m just simple though. I’m curious to see what else people were able to pick up on the first time through the movie. I guarantee I missed something. This is one of those movies I look forward to seeing the DVD extras on. You can tell parts had to be trimmed down for the sake of time. I feel like there was more about Al’s future experiences we probably did not get a chance to see in the big screen version. But again, I look forward to the DVD.

Overall: 7.5 out of 10.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Mon Soleil" - Ashley Park

If there's anything people take away from my piss-poor legacy, I hope it's what a huge, unabashed fan of "Emily in Paris" I am and will continue to be. People love "90 Day Fiancee," "The Bachelor," and other garbage - allow me "Emily," which is at least harmless, kind of goofy fluff (which does, unfortunately, lean into some stereotypes, as the country of Ukraine knows ). I have already watched Season 2 twice. And honestly my favorite part of this show (despite my crush on Camille Razart and Lily Collins channeling Audrey Hepburn hardcore ) is Ashley Park. This woman has superstar written all over her. She's a bona fide Broadway star, and "Emily in Paris" has served as her pivot into the zeitgeist.  "Emily in Paris" is also showcasing her vocal prowess front and center this season, with her covering BTS, "All By Myself," "Sympathtique," and Marilyn Monroe. But the real standout performance is th

Appropriate Holiday Gift Ideas for the Single Lady

While some people may see it as a drag, there are plenty of benefits to being single during the holiday season. During this time of the year, there are tons of parties you can attend that you may not have had the opportunity to if you were in a relationship. There’s also not as much stress on you as a single gal during the holidays because you don’t have to shop for your partner and extended family members  or  stress over where to eat Christmas dinner.  Not everyone sees the bright side of being fancy free during the holidays, and, tragically, they aren't afraid to let us single ladies know. Not only are single women subjected to even more harassment and ridicule during the holiday season, they’re also given the most obnoxious gifts by those who can’t comprehend how anyone can be both happy and single. Whether it’s a self-help book (desperately) trying to reinforce how great is to be single or the gift of a year-long subscription to Match.com , single women are presented with

Give JR a Break

Recently, I've been reading some sites that have criticized James Roday, the lead actor on the USA show PSYCH for an apparent weight gain. But you know what? Who gives a flying fizzle stick if James Roday is slightly larger than he was 4 years ago. Apparently, it wasn't enough to scare away his current girlfriend/ co-star Maggie Lawson. (Who is one hell of a Catch!) And NO they are not engaged. That seems to be nothing more than a rumor, but there is a very high chance of it happening in the near future. Anyway, as long as PSYCH continues to entertain I don't mind about James Roday's waist. He, and Dule Hill, and Corbin Bernson too, can eat all the fried broccoli they want. The last episode of PSYCH wasn't so smashing, but I don't blame it on dietary issues. QATFYG: Are you keeping up with Psych? And who is hotter, James Roday or Maggie Lawson? (Trick Question but idk why) PS: If you have heard any more news on Roday and Lawson becoming Roday-Lawson, send it