Skip to main content

Looper: A review


SPOILERS

SO I saw the new movie Looper recently. It was a time-travel-crime-drama that I have to say was one of the better movies I have seen in a while.


Looper is defiantly one of those movies you have to see more than once to catch everything it has to offer. Kind of like another of JGL's movies...


Basically, Joseph Gordon-Levitt plays a “looper” named Joe in the year 2044. A looper is an agent hired by a crime syndicate (that exists 30 years in the future) to kill people sent back to the year 2044. Keeping up so far?

JGL gets a pay day to kill each of the people sent back to him. He does this loyally to the leader of the 2044 syndicate, Al (Jeff Daniels), until it comes time for JGL to “close his loop.” Closing a loop means killing ones future self. This proves difficult for him as his future self turns out to be Bruce Willis.

Still a BAMF minus the hair.

I loved the concept of this movie. The writers were able to keep the time line clean enough so that there was not too much confusion when it came to people and events.  That is never easy to do when it comes to anything time travel.

MORE SPOILERS

My only major gripe with the movie was that it was JGL’s first lead role but his character was a reflection of Bruce Willis. All of his acting potential and all of his abilities went in to mimicking an actor who already had a set acting style. I’m not saying JGL was terrible at it quite the contrary actually. He was able to perfectly reflect Bruce’s facial expressions, mannerisms, and even his voice. Add on the CG effects and he looked and acted EXACTLY like Bruce Willis. This is a great reflection on an actor when they are so easily able to play a role like that. I guess I was just disappointed that he did not have the opportunity to showcase more of his talents as an actor. He did not have the opportunity to make his first lead role “his own” since it was just a reflection of a preexisting actor with an already established acting style.  



When it comes to time travel movies, even when the time line is kept nice and clean questions start to arise. I was left wondering why the crime syndicate of the future didn’t just kill people in the future and send their corpses to the past to be disposed. After all the main reason they were being sent back to the past was because, “It’s near impossible to hide a body in the future.” That way they could be sure the person was dead and they would not have to worry about a “loop running.”

1.21 GIGAWATTS!!!
 
I also wished there had been a little more development with the character referred to as “Kid.” He worked for Al and had a knack for doing stupid sh*t.  He was really cocky but only ever managed to f*ck up and make the situation worse than it already was. I had no idea (until a friend pointed it out) that Kid was the 2044 version of Jeff Daniel’s character, Al. Looking back I can see the subtle hints in the movie. Both characters walked with a limp, both had a southern drawl, and no matter how bad Kid managed to f*ck up, Al never seemed to do more than break a few bones. I didn’t realize he was preserving the character as not to harm his future self. The hints were super subtle and I feel like that would have been an opportunity for a “big reveal” at the end of the movie. 

"I'm going to need you to explain that one more time."

Maybe I’m just simple though. I’m curious to see what else people were able to pick up on the first time through the movie. I guarantee I missed something. This is one of those movies I look forward to seeing the DVD extras on. You can tell parts had to be trimmed down for the sake of time. I feel like there was more about Al’s future experiences we probably did not get a chance to see in the big screen version. But again, I look forward to the DVD.

Overall: 7.5 out of 10.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Chang-E" - Emmy the Great (new album out 10/9)

Emmy the Great drops her new album tomorrow on Bella Union - the fastest album she says she's ever created.  "April /月音" was completed after a trip to to her birth city Hong Kong in 2017. In early 2018, Emmy the Great made "April /月音" in a two-week period in Brooklyn - which was delayed for release until now because of her maternity leave. After recording this album, Emmy moved (for good) back to Hong Kong.  Since her original trip to Hong Kong, things have become quite tumultuous there. Said Emmy. "I’ll never know why the city called me back, but I know what it gave me. In return, I want to give it this album. That Mid-Autumn, nobody could have predicted what was to come, neither the atomization that began with the anti-Extradition Law protests in June 2019, nor the struggle for democracy that continues now, through the Covid-19 pandemic. To witness your birth city in its greatest moment of need is a powerful, humbling event, and I know I watched Hong Kong

Give JR a Break

Recently, I've been reading some sites that have criticized James Roday, the lead actor on the USA show PSYCH for an apparent weight gain. But you know what? Who gives a flying fizzle stick if James Roday is slightly larger than he was 4 years ago. Apparently, it wasn't enough to scare away his current girlfriend/ co-star Maggie Lawson. (Who is one hell of a Catch!) And NO they are not engaged. That seems to be nothing more than a rumor, but there is a very high chance of it happening in the near future. Anyway, as long as PSYCH continues to entertain I don't mind about James Roday's waist. He, and Dule Hill, and Corbin Bernson too, can eat all the fried broccoli they want. The last episode of PSYCH wasn't so smashing, but I don't blame it on dietary issues. QATFYG: Are you keeping up with Psych? And who is hotter, James Roday or Maggie Lawson? (Trick Question but idk why) PS: If you have heard any more news on Roday and Lawson becoming Roday-Lawso

movies you should see: hiroshima mon amour

Hiroshima, Mon Amour this movie has been on my mind a lot lately, due to the recent events in Japan. when I saw it about a year ago, it easily made an impression on me. easily. it was just so beautiful, in every way thinkable. it follows the story of a French actress and her Japanese architect lover, having a conversation together as they lie in bed. the majority of the film is told in flashbacks of their lives in WWII (the film was made in 1959, so there's a ten year gap there). he was directly affected by the dropping of the atom bomb in Hiroshima; she was ostracized due to her involvement with a German soldier. the reason I was propelled to see it was the song "Burning Hearts" by My Favorite- "I was an architect, she was an actress, I drew the Eiffel Tower upon her dress." (really good song too, by the way! RIP My Favorite). luckily, you can find the movie online. here's a portion of it: I HOPE YOU LIKE READING FILMS it's given credit (so I am